Weekend Reading – Are you ready for a 40-year retirement?
Hey Folks,
Welcome to a new Weekend Reading edition, citing another article I found about (40-year) retirement timelines to plan for…
Before that take, some recent reads on my site:
I mentioned last week that I don’t believe in any retirement age, rather, it’s when you are ready financially, physically and mentally too.
And earlier this week, I shared a new dividend income update as we prepare and organize our portfolio a bit more to leave the corporate world per se at the end of March 2026.
Weekend Reading – Are you ready for a 40-year retirement?

Yes, I believe so – otherwise I wouldn’t be leaving my organization in a few months – but I can appreciate the long-term retirement timeline can be scary…
Retired for 40-years??
Well, that’s what Manulife mentioned you probably need to prepare for but this also implies most retirees in their mid- to late-50s will live to age 95 or beyond which is not quite correct of course.
According to this recent study, almost half of the retirees in a survey by Manulife Group Retirement stopped working earlier than they planned at an average age of 59 — and the bulk of these early retirements were for reasons beyond their control. Either they suffered a health issue, needed to care for a loved one or lost their job.
Instead of the 20 to 30 “golden years” of earlier generations, workers today are potentially looking at retirements that span 40 years or more.
The Manulife study said many of the retirees in its study were surprised at how expensive retirement was and how fast they were going through their savings.
And also, fewer had a formal retirement plan than Canadians who retired later and 11 per cent had no income other than government pensions, compared with 6 per cent of those who retired when planned.
- The Older You Get, The More Planning You Do: Retirement planning becomes an increased priority as survey members age, with 49% of Baby Boomers having a retirement plan as opposed to just 26% of Millennials.
- The Confidence Divide: Gen Z is the least confident generation financially, with 48% feeling that their finances are fair or poor, compared to 40% for Millennials, Gen X, and Baby Boomers.
- Inflation Worries Everyone: Across Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, and Baby Boomers, inflation remains a persistent worry. At least 50% or more of respondents from each cohort say they are worried about inflation and the cost of living.
Maybe not unlike the study, which I did not participate in, I have similar retirement concerns so I don’t think I’m alone…
- How bad could inflation get over time – will my portfolio keep up?
- Will I overspend?
- What does my health/healthcare look like long-term?
- What extended rate of returns should I expect?
We have our Financial Independence Budget here that includes some of those assumptions and I will update that post in the spring of 2026 when retirement starts for both of us…
Do you have the same concerns? Did you have the same concerns when you retired?
More Weekend Reading – Beyond are you ready for a 40-year retirement?
Passionate DIY investor and dividend investor Henry Mah wrote about his go-go, slower-go and no-go retirement spending years. An interesting take from someone that has been there, done that.
Why he loves investing in about 10-12 Canadian stocks in his 80s:
“I prefer having the choice of being able to decide if and when, I wish to spend less. Better yet, I like not having to worry about spending more during retirement, because I earn more income than we need. I also don’t need to sell capital to cover our retirement expenses, and even when I have sold shares to gift, or donate, my investment income hasn’t suffered. In fact, we do sell capital, fairly large amounts of capital, and our retirement investment income continues to meet our needs, without needing to cut our living expenses. Go figure?”
I like money market funds in my/our registered accounts for cash equivalents for the same reasons Christine Benz from Morningstar does:

A good Globe Financial Facelift article here (subscription), in that the retiree, Tammy, age 64, seriously needs to accelerate her significant $1.75M in RRSP assets very soon unless she wants a higher tax bill later in life. The article is an excellent reminder that RRSP/RRIF assets are meant to be spent such that ideally taxation is smoothed-out over many spending years, to offer you the ability to spend any non-registered or TFSA assets as you please. Keeping TFSAs intact as a large emergency fund later in life is generally smart tax planning.
Related to that:
If you want to find out about a great withdrawal strategy for anyone in their mid-60s, like Tammy, with RRSP assets as their primary retirement income source, well, read on below:
With thanks from my friend and fan of this site, Ken Kivenko, Canadians seem to be waking up to the high cost of actively managed mutual funds – and avoiding them – going to some lower-cost ETFs instead. Good stuff. With various discount brokerage tools available to DIY investors, along with all-in-one ETFs to consider owning, Canadians are better served to save for their financial future…
Canadian ETF industry assets reached $545.09 billion at the end of October, surpassing the previous record of $533.77 billion in September 2025….
From my favourite Brain Food site: @FarnamStreet
“When you’re impatient with results, every day feels expensive. When you’re impatient with effort, every day feels like progress.”
Thanks for your readership and have a great weekend!
Mark
Maybe include a chart with terms explaining what Gen z vs X or etc mean. Believe it or not, many of us have no clue.
Oh? Maybe, thanks. Via a quick search:
Generation X (Gen X) is the age group born approximately between 1965 and 1980. As of 2025, this puts Gen Xers in the age range of 45 to 60 years old. So, Gen Y is younger than this range. Boomers are older. 🙂
Cheers!
Ok, for me it is probably planning for 30 yrs. ahead since am @66. This based on my own good health so far, mobility and also my parents’….85 (father) and 90(mother) before they each died. Unless our health care system changes very drastically re privatization, I’m fine for living.
Well planned, Jean. 30+ years ahead of coverage seems smart in your 60s.
Good health wishes back.
Mark
This article raises some great points about planning for a long retirement. It’s essential to think about how to manage finances over such an extended period. I’d love to hear more about specific investment strategies that could help in this situation!
Thanks, Julia.
Do share any questions you might have!
A bias to stocks/equities vs. bonds/fixed income is likely wise.
https://www.myownadvisor.ca/how-to-invest-for-higher-inflation/
Cheers,
Mark
Christine is obviously in the US; not sure if it works differently overthere. I find MMFs more painful than HISAs. You need to constantly reinvest distributions; otherwise they just sit in the account doing nothing except earning returns for the brokerage. The interest MMFs pay is consistently worse than HISAs (at least for me), and you cant move money around instantaneously like you can with HISAs. And no CDIC. It seems like a lose-lose-lose-lose type of product but I might be missing something. The only time I used MMFs was when I allowed TDDI to bribe me with a 2% incentive; and that was because TDDI’s lack of options.
You raise excellent points on the CDIC but recall ETFs and stocks don’t have CDIC either. CDIC coverage does not apply to investment products like stocks, bonds, funds, etc.
I like HISA for simplicity too.
I also like GICs.
Nothing wrong with investing the distributions; just like a stock/ETF DRIP.
All told, money market funds are not for everyone.
Just like bonds are not for everyone.
I think whatever you are doing to meet your investing goals and cashflow needs, is probably enough.
What are you investing in these days? Have you switched to all-in-one ETFs?
Cheers,
Mark
The purpose of cash in my portfolio is safety in the event of extreme situations. Its not comparable to stocks at all, which is why CDIC is relevant. If one is holding cash for other reasons then perhaps cdic isn’t important. I don’t generally like GICs because of the lack of liquidity but made exceptions for a limited amount when rates approached 6%.
I have not switched to all in ones; mostly in VTI/XIC/VIU/ZDB. All in ones have advantages but my portfolio was built before they came along, is more tax efficient and I will stick to it.
Ya, GICs were delivering great returns until rates dropped!
I don’t mind GICs for locking up a bit of short-term money; if the plan is not to touch it for the term.
I think they are good vehicles for that. It really depends on your needs.
I can appreciate the tax efficiency angle on ETFs. All-in-ones can be excellent for registered accounts.
Mark
The problem comes if you have CCPC and non-reg which focus on Canada for tax reasons. All in ones in registered then translate to screwed up regional allocations (as well as asset allocation but that could be addressed). You also lose some withholding tax in registered accounts with all-in-ones = which is not insignificant for larger portfolios in later stages. Simplicity and psychological advantages possibly outweigh these drawbacks if one is starting from scratch.
…but in general I think that all assets should be managed as a single portfolio using the same policy/approach – regardless of the type of account and with similar asset allocation so that risk is managed on after-tax basis. And having one type of strategy for reg and another type for non-reg would make it more difficult in my case.
Very wise. I don’t have any all-in-ones in my non-reg = just CDN stocks at this time.
Won’t be working after spring 2026 so a bit of cashflow there from non-reg. for us but lots of lower-yielding stocks there too.
Yes, withholding tax in registered using CDN-listed ETFs but I’m more about simplicity now vs. trying to navigate other things. I’ve mentioned as much on the site and will continue to simplify as I age.
Ex-North America stuff went nowhere for a long-time compared to my CDN stocks/XIU and some XAW has done VERY well as you know since COVID started so happy with the results and such, but maybe Developed Markets are going to have their day per se now and that’s why you diversify – you just don’t know when things will shift. So, XAW is good for that for me with 25% weight. It has some Emerging too in higher % than any “EQT” stuff.
VTI is a stellar U.S.-listed fund as you know for registered. Hard to argue with that…
I’m of the mindset that if it ain’t broken, don’t fix it.
Non-Reg. total return up over 200% in the last 10-years.
Registered stuff done very well too with my hybrid mix of stocks + ETFs…although CDN stocks flying this year. We’ll see how long that lasts???
Keep some cash for upcoming withdrawals.
I’m a pretty simple guy!
Nice to chat,
Mark
Hi Mark. Interesting how in my grandparents days your life expectancy was 40 or 50 years. Now we are talking about 40 years or more in retirement. Some people’s careers are 40 years or so and then 40 years of retirement. Some really new concepts being tossed around. I used to worry about not having enough saved to retire but I believe we are now good on that. Then there’s inflation concerns and again I believe our portfolio can survive a little inflation. To me the big concern is health. Can my wife and I stay healthy enough to enjoy a long retirement. That’s something my spreadsheet cannot calculate. Cheers Mark.
I know, right?
It is my hope I live a long, healthy, life but no guarantees. Going to lift some weights and go for a >5 km walk today to help. 🙂
My math/projections has us being “OK” until age 95 with sustained 5% annualized returns with 3% inflation = 2% real return over the next 40 years.
Health is wealth, to your point, and I wish you and your wife the best.
Mark
Hi Mark ~ Great post and discussion as always! As someone who’s considered a GIC ladder (guilty as charged!) I’m intrigued by the Christine Benz approach of buying “a federal money market fund from a very low-cost provider that pays you the lion’s share of prevailing yields”. I’d love to know more about this but the wording almost sounds like a “Jeopardy” question. Any chance you might flesh this comment out with perhaps a few examples, please? Many thanks in advance!
Hey Barbara,
Nothing wrong with a GIC ladder, very wise, and maybe depending on your GIC rates – likely getting more return than money market funds.
Here is a good primer.
https://www.moneysense.ca/glossary/what-is-a-money-market-fund-in-canada/
https://www.canadalife.com/investing-saving/saving/money-market-funds-vs-savings-accounts.html
I like money market funds myself for registered accounts (instead of parking just cash) but I’m also a fan of GICs assuming you are not touching that money until term.
I hope that helps!
Mark
Hello Mark,
Yeah that retirement planning discussion:)
For myself my biggest concern and here I might sound weird is the problem of filling and occupying my time when I decide to turn the switch off , right now when I take my holidays and if we’re not traveling I find myself bored and wanted to go back to work ( I know I’m weird) 🙂 so yeah it’s the challenge of filling out time 24/7 and for someone who simply doesn’t have many sports hobbies I find it challenging and the only thing that I find myself doing is volunteering in the community or traveling.
As for the financial part our income from our dividends matches our salaries and if I still have one property that we would sell once we decide to retire and along with my wife’s db pension we’re more than set and of course helping the kids as well.
So yeah a different challenge for us not the financial but what to do with all the free time.
Nice to hear from you, Gus.
Ya, as long as I keep the blog, volunteer, some part-time work maybe in 2026 (?), I shouldn’t be too bored but we shall see?!
Our goal by 2027 or 2028 is to have the cashflow from our portfolio be > expenses.
Right now, I consider ourselves financially independent with 5% returns….income (dividends + gains) covers all our expenses.
At some point, for some extra margin of safety, it would be great at even 3% yield if the cashflow outpaced expenses but not really needed since I have a small DB pension that will come online at age 65 with CPP and OAS – so that will be good.
How much does the pension cover for your expenses, is it significant? More than 50% of your expenses?
Cheers,
Mark
Nice to hear from you, Gus.
Ya, as long as I keep the blog, volunteer, some part-time work maybe in 2026 (?), I shouldn’t be too bored but we shall see?!
Our goal by 2027 or 2028 is to have the cashflow from our portfolio be > expenses.
Right now, I consider ourselves financially independent with 5% returns….income (dividends + gains) covers all our expenses.
At some point, for some extra margin of safety, it would be great at even 3% yield if the cashflow outpaced expenses but not really needed since I have a small DB pension that will come online at age 65 with CPP and OAS – so that will be good.
How much does the pension cover for your expenses, is it significant? More than 50% of your expenses?
Cheers,
Mark