Tax Efficient Investing – Horizons ETFs
It’s hard to understate the game-changing force that Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) have induced in the financial investing landscape in recent years – especially here in Canada – let alone some of the tax efficient ETFs now on the market.
According to National Bank’s recent figures, an incredible $37 billion flowed into ETFs (and that was just the year to date!)
Yet as I have referenced many times on my site, not all ETFs are created equal. Far from it!
With more than 1,000 ETFs now listed in Canada, it might seem hard to choose what the top funds are.
Frankly, not so. I believe there are only a few dozen funds you and I should really consider for lazy but powerful long-term investing.
Horizons ETFs has some of those products in my opinion (no affiliation), and I highlighted at least one of them in my recent all-equity, all-in-one post here where it comes to HGRO.
All-in-one funds with some tax efficiency too!
With just one simple ETF selection, Canadian ETF investors (whether that be HGRO or other funds I have on my ETFs page below) can get a full asset allocation geared towards their self-determined risk/return objectives.
Read on about the merits of low-cost investing via Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) right here.
Pretty amazing how far we’ve come on this in just a few short years…
Some of these ETFs can now be considered what Horizons has tagged as the “great investment democratizer” — an ETF option that can suit almost every retail investor.
As one of Canada’s leading (not to mention fastest-growing ETF providers) I had the privilege of chatting with Mark Noble, Executive Vice President, ETF Strategy at Horizons ETFs about their ETF line-up including their all-one-funds and beyond. We touched on the tax-efficiency of their ETF funds, why Mark feels investors should consider larger equity weightings in their portfolios, the classic case of overcoming home bias, how Mark invests his own money, and more.
Mark, thanks so much for your time recently and contributions to this site. I’ll put my questions in bold font so we don’t confuse readers with the My Own Advisor Mark back-and-forth!
No problem Mark! I’m happy to contribute to your site and it’s a blog that I know of and follow for what you do to help Canadian investors – so keep up the great work.
Kind words and thanks.
Before any discussion about Horizons funds specifically, I want to know what you make of the inflows into ETFs in recent years. I mean, as an investor in some low-cost funds myself, it seems retail investors are catching on and winning. Quick thoughts on that?
Horizons products aside, I think this trend is outstanding for investors. Whether investors choose to own some of our low-cost and tax-efficient products, or others by several of Canada’s leading fund providers, the evidence is clear: one of the greatest predictors of future returns for the retail investor is keeping their money management fees low while maintaining a consistent investing strategy.
We’re happy to contribute to this trend including education for investors.
There was some significant eyeballs on my site after I published this post comparing your HGRO fund to Vanguard’s VEQT and iShares product XEQT.
Clearly, readers are intrigued. Some readers sent me emails wondering/seeking more details about the corporate class structure of your funds. Two questions:
- What are corporate class funds; do these relate to ETFs as well as mutual funds?
- Can we explain corporate class funds in layman’s terms?
Sure thing Mark.
To answer part of the first question, yes, ETFs and mutual funds are regulated the same way when it comes to the corporate class structure. The regulators in Canada do not view them as different securities, which is quite different than other regulatory jurisdictions I might add.
To back up a bit, your readers are likely aware that mutual funds pool money collected from many investors and use the money to invest in securities, such as stocks and bonds. Mutual funds provide investors with access to professionally managed money – for a fee of course.
Consider an ETF as a more efficient mutual fund in many cases that can be bought and sold on a stock exchange, during the trading day. I won’t go into too many more details because your readers are likely well-versed on the ETF concept and some of the benefits they can provide.
Corporate class funds, including the ETFs we manage at Horizons, operate within a structure that allows the ETF units to be held as a series of shares within a traditional corporation. As many of your readers might know, a corporation operates with profits and losses. So, for funds as part of a corporate class structure, the taxable events like capital gains can be traded off against any potential losses or distributions to the fund owner. The ability to offset the tax liability within the fund structure can be very appealing and tax efficient for many investors.
There are a couple of key benefits of this fund structure then, and why they continue to grow in popularity:
- There is the advantage of tax deferral. This is a consideration for personal and corporate investment accounts since reducing overall taxes is important for many investors.
- Related to point 1, if investors are investing this way, then there’s no reason to realize capital gains until you want to or have to – when they sell the ETF shares So, not only is there a tax deferral but potentially lower taxes paid overall when gains are realized.
Corporate class funds, including ETFs Mark, whether they are from our family of ETFs or other companies in Canada that offer them, might be very beneficial to investors who wish to own these funds in their taxable accounts, but these funds can also work well inside TFSAs, RRSPs, and other registered accounts.
OK, I’ve got more questions from readers. One of them wanted me to ask you if you see any changes coming to corporate class funds in the near future. I mean, didn’t the federal government cite these funds as having an unfair tax advantages?
Great question and yes, I suppose our regulations and laws could always change. There could be changes to the capital gains inclusion rate, or the implementation of a lifetime cap to Tax Free Savings Account (TFSA) contributions, and lots of other potential changes. With regards to the proposed changes in 2019, that impacted the TRI ETFs, these regulations have only been proposed (in 2019) but not yet enacted. Regulatory change is usually slow and complex as policy makers have to assess unintended consequences for their proposals in consultation with the industry. At this point the 2019 proposals are a moot point since we’ve converted to the TRI ETFs to a corporate structure that allows us to be on side with the proposed legislation.
In terms of further regulatory changes, if any were to be proposed they would likely have to fundamentally change the use of the broader corporate class fund structure. This corporate class fund structure has been around for decades so we would not anticipating any sweeping changes to occur without industry consultation Hypothetically, though if the government for example eliminated the ability of funds to use the corporate structure, their historical operating procedure is to provide transition time for fund providers to make changes. They typically don’t want to retroactively punish unit holders and firms that have been in compliance with existing laws. The only exception to this was the how the government managed the income trust structure changes many years ago – it was not well received!
Any methodology or changes proposed by the government to date, in that 2019 budget announcement, will not alter our approach since we’ll be able to comply with any of the legislation they’ve shared to date.
So, should investors be concerned with our corporate class structure? The worst case scenario is potentially the government forces all corporate class funds or ETFs (including all providers) to deliver the returns of the underlying indexes to investors as taxable income versus have it be deferred under the current rules of the corporate class structure. However, as long as we can operate in this tax-efficient structure to support investors, we will.
That makes sense to me Mark and I suspect it would be a seismic shift if it were to even occur. So, it seems a corporate class fund structure is very appealing for taxable accounts. Silly question maybe, but are your funds better suited for taxable accounts over registered accounts (e.g., TFSAs, RRSPs)? Can you speak to that?
Yes, certainly we believe our ETFs are very appealing for taxable accounts, such as HXT (our S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) or HXS; HXS.U (our S&P 500 Index ETF) but your readers might be very interested to know that many of our funds including the HGRO fund (Horizons Growth TRI ETF Portfolio) – the all-equity fund you linked to above Mark – has outperformed many benchmark peers. We can discuss why that is in more detail.
Perfect, so that leads me to this question on HGRO in particular. Do you feel there is a competitive advantage of owning HGRO vs. VEQT vs. XEQT?
Yes, and it has to do with our portfolio design in that fund.
Through our back-testing, when we looked at the NASDAQ, we saw an opportunity to design HGRO with a larger weighting in that index over our peers – and design the fund so it will deliver lower overall volatility and better returns. I mean, if you look at the S&P 500 right now, there’s an issue (with potential returns) when you strip out big tech.
At Horizons, we believe in a slight tilt in favour of the NASDAQ behind our larger allocation to U.S. large cap stocks. That allocation is expected to deliver very favourable long-term returns when compared to our peer group.
In HGRO, we’re talking about an all-equity fund, that invests in your corporate class ETFs. This HGRO fund is something I’m personally considering for my taxable corporate account or personal, taxable account in 2021. Many investors are wary of equities, too much volatility but I think many investors should learn to live with more stocks in their portfolio. What’s your take on that?
I couldn’t agree more with you!
I mean, there are the demographic reasons to own more equities with people living longer. So, returns are required for longer periods of time. I believe that needs to be reflected in any investor’s long-term strategic allocation.
Yet there are major investing risks with owning a good portion of your portfolio in bonds. For one, we know the inverse relationship between bond prices and interest rates. But I think more importantly investors are going to have to consider their risk relationship with bonds. Higher returns come from higher-risk assets such as owning stocks. This is just market dynamics at work. So, if investors are living longer, and needing more assets to draw down over time from their portfolio, it makes sense to own more equities from a tactical advantage.
I often find investors, especially do-it-yourself (DIY) investors struggle with risk concepts the most. Either they don’t take on enough risk (or are therefore far too conservative when it comes to owning too many bonds/fixed income assets for what they need) or they take on way too much risk (and tinker with their portfolio too often). Neither extreme is beneficial to good returns.
Let’s talk about your own portfolio. I mean, you’re the ETF strategist so are you an all-ETFs-guy or do you actually favour some “core and explore”? As a follow-up, do Canadians have far too much home bias in their portfolios – particularly when it comes to dividend paying stocks?
I’ll be honest Mark, I do follow a core and some explore strategy myself and I do so because it aligns with my investing tolerance for risk that I alluded to above.
I have no problem with investors owning a mix of core and explore, either our products or some of our competitor products for that matter, as long as they have a disciplined investment plan or policy in place. As we have discussed, that can be a major challenge for some DIY investors to stick to a plan.
When it comes to home bias, I think it’s another challenge to overcome. I recall one of the latest reports I read mentioned the average investor in the U.S. probably has close to 60% of their portfolio in U.S. equities. That’s not so bad given the role the U.S. market has on the world stage. Canada hovers between 2-4% of the global world market cap, so for Canadians to have 50-60% of their portfolios (or more) in just in the Canadian market I feel that’s far too high/too much home bias.
Relative to market cap size, I suspect many Canadian investors have far too much bias in financial, energy and material sectors. Now, if you have dividend paying equities in just your taxable account as part of your explore, then that makes strategic sense since I know you’re aware of the tax efficiency that Canadian dividend paying stocks provide in non-registered accounts. So, I do defend investors keeping those Canadian dividend payers like you do in your taxable for that reason.
(My Own Advisor: here are some links about that aforementioned tax treatment:
Get the 101 on our Canadian Dividend Tax Credit
Should you invest in a taxable account? If so, here are some considerations.)
But, I think if you’re going to leverage your registered accounts wisely, it’s best to diversify beyond Canada’s borders. I like Canadian banks for their dividends as much as other investors but by only focusing on that, you’re missing out on other sectors let alone the upside of other markets if you only look at Canada for investing success.
Of note, your readers may be interested to know I own some Horizons ETFs in my personal portfolio, I actually have one that is my largest single holding (that is a one-ticket solution – I will leave you to guess which one….) but I do hold some individual stocks as part of my explore.
Great insights and well-framed. I like your take on core and explore. Thanks for your time Mark!
Anytime! I hope this information has helped your readership.
As a team, we aim to also help educate Canadians as well, I want your subscribers to know we’re happy to answer any questions about our Horizons ETF lineup, or our approach, anytime.
You can reach us by email at firstname.lastname@example.org or by phone at 1.866.641.5739. You can also follow Horizons ETFs on LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook and send us your questions or ideas by direct message there!
My summary and takeaways
Clearly, Mark Noble and his team at Horizons have the customer in mind and I was appreciative of our 30-40 minute discussion recently on these key subjects. His insights about core and explore, references to focus on total returns, how as investors we need to overcome our home biases, and encouragement to think strategically towards owning more equities was, for me, very reassuring when it comes to my DIY investing plan.
Should you have any questions about any Horizons ETFs or their all-in-one TRI portfolios such as HGRO, HBAL, or HCON, do drop them a line and I know they’ll be happy to answer anything.
Thanks for diving into this post and I look forward to your comments on these ETFs or other!
Added after posting!
Some readers had some specific follow-up questions – so here they are (thanks to the team at Horizons ETFs for the direct answers!)
Question 1: So, in holding HBAL or HGRO or the other “TRI” all-in-one fund in a taxable account, are there any capital gains to be incurred if/when those TRI funds rebalance x2 per year? I recall they are rebalanced at that frequency.
Answer 1: The ETFs have historically incurred capital gains (and losses) when they rebalance, however the determination of how much these capital gains are is determined at year end, and there can be instances where some or all of these gains can be offset at the fund level so they are not paid out.
Question 2: Also, as a follow-up then, would there be any instance beyond selling HBAL or HGRO units in a taxable account by the unitholder whereby capital gains or a taxable event may have to be reported by the investor?
Answer 2: Yes, as mentioned the ETFs do generate some income, primarily returns from currency forwards they use to hedge out foreign currency exposure and in some circumstances potential capital gains from selling ETFs at a gain during the biannual re-balance periods.