Is Financial Independence Retire Early (FIRE) right for you?

FIRE

I read a boatload of personal finance and investing articles within any given month.  One thing that continues to get my attention is this FIRE movement – the desire of various blog authors to be financially independent and therefore retire early.

I think I’ve noticed this movement online now more than ever.  I also remember reading about this in The Practical Guide to Financial Independence by Graeme Falco, a CPA from Toronto.  It was a central theme in this book.  In it Graeme wrote:

Financial Independence means having enough.  “More specifically, FI is achieved when income earned from passive sources exceeds one’s expenses.  Passive income comes from anything that doesn’t require a lot of time or effort, such as real estate, stocks, bonds, or a business that mostly runs itself.”

“The social commentary on this subject is nothing new and many people will be able to relate FI to the concept of “F—K you, money”.  This money gives you power to say no (or yes) to bosses, co-workers, and just about anyone else.”

“Everyone seeking FI will have to make a decision about retirement, whether it’s early or not.  It’s a personal decision and I can’t tell you which choice to make, but the freedom of choice should like a good problem to have.”

This movement has me reflecting on our own financial journey of late.

FIRE

Is FIRE something we’re genuinely interested in pursuing?

If so, how serious are we?

It seems appealing but there are also drawbacks.  The following questions have swirled in my head on this subject:

  • What would it mean for us – financially – to get there?
  • What changes or sacrifices would occur?
  • What “freedoms” might we enjoy?
  • What drawbacks or other considerations have we not thought about?

What would it mean for us – financially?

Mr. Money Mustache (the-retire-early-through-badassity-guy) claims he and his family of three live off about $25,000 USD per year.  That’s give or take around $32,000 per year here in Canada.  That seems pretty frugal.

I recall his blog makes close to 20 times this amount now – in a year.  So, I guess what he used to live on in his frugal days has little relevance now.  He could certainly spend much, much, more if he wanted to – but does not.  My point is, most FIRE folks like MMM live rather frugally in their 20s, 30s or 40s to realize their financial independence goals.  Based on my knowledge, unless you are a successful entrepreneur or have a very high income it’s not realistic to “retire” in your 30s or 40s without a very high savings rate.  MMM happens to have accomplished both.

If we continue living like we do – a balanced approach to spending and saving – I’ve calculated my wife and I will not become financially independent until we are between the ages of 50-55. Even then, age 50 is an aggressive target.  This is still early retirement by some standards but likely not early enough to be considered FIRE.  (I don’t know is there is an age-related FIRE definition or not…)

I believe we could cut off a year or two from the age 50 target date if most of the following were to occur or continue:

  • Avoid taking on any new debt in the future. (Meaning, kill the mortgage and be done with debt for good.)
  • Significantly downsize from our accommodations. (See below for sacrifices.)
  • Reinvest dividends and distributions paid from our investments. (We do this in all registered accounts today.)
  • Obtain exceptional returns on our investments, close to 10% per year every year going forward. (We have no control over this mind you nor is this likely to happen.)
  • Increase “side-hustle” / blog income in a significant way. (This may or may not occur.  It is highly unlikely it will occur to the income stratosphere that is the MMM blog.)

At age 50, I’m forecasting our monthly operating expenses will be about $4,000 give or take per month – a solid $1,300 per month more than the uber-frugal MMM even when you factor in our Canada-U.S. exchange rate. These expenses include mind you about $400 worth on contingency money.

In any event it is our expectation that the income generated from our capital will cover basic living expenses.  To realize FIRE sooner, some major changes or sacrifices would need to occur.

What changes or sacrifices would occur?

Some of the FIRE articles I’ve read clearly state a mortgage-free existence was a key ingredient to their early retirement.  I could see why…

When I look at our home operating costs the math adds up real damn quick:

  • Property taxes ($350 per month)
  • Home utilities (heat, hydro = $250 per month) + (water/well, septic, telcos = $300 per month)
  • Home maintenance (budget $400-$500 per month)
  • Home insurance (approaching $180 per month)

The sum of these monthly operating expenses (excluding mortgage payments or prepayments) give or take is about $1,600 per month.  Add up mortgage payments (and prepayments) and that’s thousands per month devoted to just shelter.

Just looking at that, you may assume a) we’re nuts to own a home and b) renting in Ottawa would have been a far better choice.  Maybe to a point but home ownership is more than a financial decision.  It’s very much a lifestyle choice.  Let’s not forget we have some home equity to be thankful for.  The smaller houses in our area now sell for >$500k.  I have no idea what they may sell for in the future but I’d like to think our home will slowly appreciate in value.

The sacrifice for FIRE would be selling our home – soon or in the near future.   By selling our house, the equity in our home could be put to work.  The capital invested from selling our home could deliver some healthy investment income, likely close to $2,000 per month.   That income could be used to rent in Ottawa.  The alternative to renting would be to downsize our home rather significantly, moving within Ottawa or move to another city and buy a less expense home there.  That would also have drawbacks.  Moving away from family would certainly be one of them.

We’re ready to sell our home yet.  It doesn’t feel right – right now.

What “freedoms” might we enjoy?

I would suspect working is much better (for the most part) when don’t have to do it for the money.  I can’t say for sure but I would anticipate the freedom of time would provide us with opportunities to do a host of other things we’ve largely put off to date:

  • Spend more time together
  • Spend more time with family
  • Visit friends
  • Meet new people
  • Enjoy existing hobbies and passions
  • Try new hobbies or experiences
  • Potentially travel more
  • Become more fit (although we are trying to do this today)
  • Eat healthier (although we are working on this today)
  • Time to volunteer our time to causes and services in need.

I suspect the luxury of time can be a blessing or a curse to some people.  It would be a blessing if you have many aspirations of doing more with your life, while you still can, since time is everyone’s biggest constraint.  It would be a curse if you’re stuck in a rut or have little clue how, where, and with whom you want to spend your time.

What other considerations have we not thought about?

I don’t really know.

Maybe one drawback of FIRE is a social one.  While you’re busy living within your frugal means, the relationships you have with others may change over time.  After all, most people are working when you’re not.  This is not suggesting you can’t maintain the friendships you have but I’m thinking your social circle would evolve – potentially for the better but maybe for the worse.

I suppose another drawback is stimulation.  Work can provide lots of that for many of us.  If there is no long-term career to be had I could foresee some people struggling with that.  It’s good to be challenged in life.  It’s motivating; it can give us inspiration.

Summary

In my early 40s now, I value and appreciate time more.  FIRE is something I’ll continue to read up on and give some consideration to but my wife and I are not ready to make any radical changes.  More time and freedom would be great but instead of rushing towards this we’re more or less inching our way in this direction – enjoying the journey.  If and when those changes come though, I’ll let you know.

What’s your take on FIRE?  Is this something you’ve read about, something you’re striving for or something you’ve already achieved?  For those that don’t care about any sort of early retirement I’d like to hear from you too. 

Mark Seed is the founder, editor and owner of My Own Advisor - one of Canada's leading personal finance and investing blogs. As my own financial advisor, I've grown our portfolio from $100,000 to well over $500,000. Our next big goal is to own a $1 million investment portfolio for an early retirement. Come follow my saving and investing journey by subscribing to my site.

29 Responses to "Is Financial Independence Retire Early (FIRE) right for you?"

  1. Smart and thoughtful look at this extreme view on frugality and savings, Mark. I like Fred Vettese’s take on smoothing consumption over your lifetime so that you’re never depriving yourself or living in excess. Your balanced approach is certainly one to aspire to.

    Reply
    1. Thanks Robb. You’re doing a killer job with your site and part-time financial career. Your balanced approach doing all this with a young family is pretty inspirational.

      Mark

      Reply
  2. Live life in balance… that’s what you preach, that’s what you do… Its a great approach… who needs that Ferrari in the laneway anyway 😉 – Cheers

    Reply
      1. Seriously though, FIRE is kind of what are approach was/is… I’ve not been working for over 5 years now… my wife though because of the enticements of the job has her hanging on for a while longer… Our kid just turned 14, so arguably he has a few more years left of school to go, so we are balancing life and life’s stresses with a timely departure to have my wife drop from the workforce as my son enters it… The markets have been kind to us, or is that my brain and stock picking abilities are awesome and as such am living off my abilities 😉 Who knows, and who cares… Live life in balance, think longer term than the average and enjoy the rewards is what we are doing and living. FI is a reality depending on what you set as your retirement goals so long as you have the ability to live on less than you have coming in, and have a little luck on your side – Cheers

        Reply
        1. “Live life in balance, think longer term than the average and enjoy the rewards is what we are doing and living.”

          Well said Phil.

          I think you and others who have achieved FI are an inspiration, to me anyhow. Not that I’m trying to rush to it but I’m working towards it AND enjoying the journey. What our FI is, is not the same for someone else. At the end of the day I guess that’s the beauty of it all – personal finance is personal. 🙂

          Thanks for the insight.
          Mark

          Reply
  3. A lot of good questions: Is FIRE for you?

    We do try to aim for FIRE. At best we will be 53 when that happens. Not really early…
    Then again, being part of the community, understanding the principles of the journey has thought us so sos so much on what we value in life, on what is important to us, that we are more free now than before.

    We live intentional now, we have fun money and holidays we like, We are grateful. One day, we even might decide to go on a big trip, blowing our budget and our FIRE plan, all for the experience.

    the way we see it now, FIRE is only one of the pillars that supports the one true goal: life a happy and meaningful life.

    Reply
    1. 53 is an excellent goal, I suspect much sooner than most. I also appreciate the principles and I think I’ve learned to tailor my own/our own plan from it. We certainly have a good portion of fun and travel money but we’re also frugal in other ways. It will be interesting to see how we feel as the years go by. The beauty of the blog is you can chronicle it 🙂 Thanks for your comment and good luck on your journey.

      Reply
  4. If I do this right and can retire from the US Army at 48 which is 11 years away I will walk away with a 4400$ @ month pension, and free Healthcare for my wife and kids. Add that to our 35k that we invest yearly I think I will be fire. Based on that we should make around 8000 a month in retirement. That is close to what I’m making now and would give me a good life.

    I will probably still work so I can pay for my kids college and put some decent money in their taxable investment accounts. Then I’m done working for someone else.

    At work I enjoy the relationships, challanges, and team work. I think I would miss that, and need it some whereelse. We always talk about buy 5 acres in someplace warm, building a house designing and digg out own pond, fishing a lot and raising military working dogs.

    I can’t and won’t live like a hermit eating oatmeal, rahman noodles, and riding my bike everywhere.

    It’s all about having the luxury today no, and be able to quit if needed.

    Reply
    1. Thanks for reading and the comment Nicky.

      No doubt your role in the US Army is stressful – that is a healthy pension for sure. Given the changes going on with Trump I can only assume your healthcare is a great gift to go along with the pension you’ve worked for.

      It also seems you’ve invested well on your own. Kudos to you!

      Reply
  5. As I’ve mentioned on my blog quite a few times lately… it’s finding the right balance between enjoying your life now and saving for the future. What’s right for you might not be right for me and vice versa. Living on either extremes do not make any sense to me. Having more time and freedom is nice but at what expense? If we sell our house today and move to move to a cheaper city or country, we are most likely already achieved FI. But we like our current lifestyle and where we live, so we’re prolonging our FI journey by a few more years to enjoy something we like, rather than doing more sacrifices.

    Reply
    1. “Living on either extremes do not make any sense to me.” Totally agree. It’s not me, it’s not us. You seem to have a very good focus on things in your life. Thanks for sharing Bob.

      Reply
  6. Great article Mark. This sums up my feelings exactly – “The social commentary on this subject is nothing new and many people will be able to relate FI to the concept of “F—K you, money”. This money gives you power to say no (or yes) to bosses, co-workers, and just about anyone else.”

    Reply
  7. Mark, this is a thoughtful piece. You’ve given careful consideration to your situation and lots of the other options/considerations. People should do the same to determine what is right for them. MMM is a very unique person, and IMHO is a rather extreme example of lifestyle/skills etc that probably isn’t going to work for many.

    We chose a balanced approach like you’re doing and have no regrets whatsoever. We worked hard for approx 30-33 years and had many great achievements and memories, a very nice lifestyle. My wife fully retired at 52, I was semi retired at 52 and full retirement on 55th birthday. In retrospect 3 years later that has been a perfect balance for us, allowing a good lifestyle during working years, freedom to choose our future and withstand a career/financial shock, still comfortable in retirement and young enough to do pretty much anything we want for years to come.

    It would have likely been possible to stop working 10-15 years earlier than we did (wife age 52, me semi @52, fully on 55th birthday) had we employed a FIRE mentality at an early age, with lesser house, no toys, fewer experiences, higher savings rate, and a lesser retirement. It’s too extreme for us in these regards, to mention a few. Even at our age now there isn’t many friends and family around to share increased free time with (most still work F/T), so that might be a consideration for some craving FIRE.

    You’re smart to focus on health as that’s a part that impacts even the best of financial plans/execution. We eat very healthy, exercise vigorously for 90-105 minutes 5 days per week, plus other activity. It gives me energy and a positive mindset. There is little I can’t do physically that even fit people decades younger can, and I hope to hold this edge for as long as I can. We’ll see.

    Good luck to you and everyone else in their journey.

    Reply
    1. Thanks Rbull. Agreed…MMM is a unique breed! You were smart to have the FIRE mentality early. It has therefore allowed you many freedoms now….this is a common denominator amongst all early retirees I find: they want it and they work hard in achieving it.

      Time on this earth is of little value without health, family, and good friends 🙂

      Reply
      1. Thanks. We were focused and committed to our goals but not extreme in any way about life. Even though we had some setbacks and adjusted our target date we were still lucky in many ways and are thankful to be where we are. Reading your blog makes me realize there are many others including you sharing a similar path and doing a great job of achieving whatever they aim for.

        Reply
        1. Thanks again…and yes…this is exactly how I approach things for the most part – having a plan and working hard to realize it. That goes for other things in my life as well 🙂 Best wishes RBull.

          Reply
  8. Mark
    Kudos to you for taking the time to think FIRE through on a personal and financial level now in your early 40s as most don’t think about the relationship and time side until they retire and then they get hit hard with reality. As many above have said balance is more likely the best method and you are living that. Given that the average age of retirement in Canada is 62/63, you are still technically in track for FIRE with your ability to retire at 53 and that age is a good one to strive for. I was FI at 51 while my wife still chose to work, I retired for a while. I decided after some time doing renos and whatever I wanted as well as starting up my own photography side job, that I still wanted more. Most of my friends and peers were still working as well. So I went back into the workforce on my terms and in a non stressful non management capacity…a big change from before. I love it and I will eventually fully retire when my wife does (she is 7 years younger), and still before I turn 60.
    I made a choice in my early 40s to ensure my kids had enough set aside to get their masters as well as to take trips and experience more of the world while young, or I could have retired long ago. This is the balance I chose on my terms and I would not go back and change it(wish I would have known what I know now in my 30s as I lost a lot in advisor mutual funds, moving me in and out for their own gain). I finally went self directed in my 40s and I am so much better off for having made that choice.
    As for budgeting and money you are wise to include for contingencies and luckily we now have TFSAs that we can invest in dividend paying stocks but also collect tax free from and dip into if needed without a tax penalty. Monthly expenses in our modest lifestyle hover around 4K per month and that is taken care of with a sub 750k portfolio of mixed stocks delivering an average of 4.187% as well as another mixed portfolio. My wife will also have a smaller (sub 1 k per month) defined pension when she retires early and it will just add to our income stream as will government benefits. At that time we will likely have grandkids and will use some of those funds for family trips and vacations and RESPs. Each person has different wants and needs and retirement goals and differing income and so will have to decide what balance is right for them. I chose my balance and then went back to work after a while for my own reasons, some will also do that.
    Enjoy the ride, have lots of experiences and make memories along the way. You only get one kick at this can, make sure you give it your best shot!
    Love your blog by the way, wish I have a knack for writing as I have lots of things to contribute to those starting the FI journey. You are touching on a lot of it already, so I will write vicariously through you lol. Cheers from the Kawarthas in South Central Ontario.
    Lou

    Reply
    1. Thanks for the detailed comment and kind words…

      I’m honestly trying to wrap my head around the whole FIRE thing. It’s something I believe we can achieve but I’m not about to burn myself out towards it. We’re in a decent place financially and we are very thankful for that.

      If the average age of retirement in Canada is 62/63 then we are ahead of that.

      Back to you, age 51 is amazing and very well done. I would love to work on my own terms and this blog is part of that passion and hobby. Again, great work on helping your kids. They are very fortunate. I have great parents that helped me out through university as well. They realized largely being debt-free by my mid-20s would be a key ingredient to my financial success.

      We have TFSAs maxed out but we choose not use those accounts for any contingencies or emergency funds. We keep cash for that. As we approach retirement I figure we need $50k in a cash fund. That will be plenty of buffer, likely too conservative, but I’m conservative when it comes to money. I suspect this has helped us get this far…hard to say 🙂

      Your current monthly expenses are inline with our forecast – about $4,000 per month. It’s not living large but rather comfortable and the right lifestyle for us. If you have a sub $750k account to fund that lifestyle then this is assurance my wife and I should be fine if we meet our goal in the coming years of $1 M and a paid-off home.

      We’ll have small pensions coming our way but not until we are age 55 or likely age 60.

      If my wife and I can both earn, eventually, $2k per month each in retirement via pensions we’ll be very fortunate and grateful.

      At the end of the day it is about enjoying the ride and so far, so good. Great to hear you’re a fan from the Kawarthas. Been there, a lovely spot!

      Reply
  9. Everyones situation is different and for many FIRE isn’t even in their radar. Is that bad? Depends on whether they are living within their means, or not. If they are than they probably are enjoying life and feel the future is something they will address later.
    If not, than life down the road will become much more difficult, or maybe they think their family or the government will provide them with what they need (good luck).

    The other point is what’s the big deal about FIRE. Life expectancy is becoming longer and retiring early may mean “Needed” much more income than working a shorter period can provide. Why not consider making ones working life better and more enjoyable before tackling the retirement issue. If you don’t like your job or career, do something about it, rather than complaining or dreaming about retirement. Retirement is a totally different life style and most people don’t consider the change or are prepared for it (Marks has some posts on this).

    I FIRE is something one desires than as mentioned develop a plan and work to achieve it.

    Reply
    1. Not bad at all actually but I’ve learned few people have the combination of 1) great income, 2) great saving habits and 3) great mindset to retire early. There is really no big deal about FIRE other than I believe having “enough” (whatever that means to you) is a very strong, self-empowered tactic to ensure you are fulfilling your goals and dreams and ambitions in life – as soon as you can. You never know when you might be taken from this earth. Having the opportunity to share what you want with those you love as long as possible is a great gift. FIRE can afford you such an opportunity if that is something dear to you.

      Some level of FIRE is meaningful to me/us so we are working our way towards that in a balanced way I believe. Everyone’s journey is very different and mine wouldn’t appeal to some or maybe it would – I don’t know – but what it means to us is the most important thing.

      Reply
      1. Well said Mark – to each their own 🙂

        I’m 57 at the happiest and most fulfilled point in my life. I have a small technology business I work at part-time to bring in some income and keep my skills current. On most days I backcountry ski, snowshoe or hike in the forests out my back door with my dogs for hours on end with my camera taking photos – no hurry or time pressures anymore.

        I planned and worked hard to live my life as I choose. I have always lived below my means and realized that spending money on experiences makes me happy – not stuff. I have $920K in ETF’s. My financial security brings me options as to what I want to do…or not. For me that brings peace and joy to my daily life.

        Reply
        1. “I have a small technology business I work at part-time to bring in some income and keep my skills current.” Wow, that’s great. Then you’re skiing, hiking, etc. Exactly how I intend to spend my time in the coming years.

          I just got back from The Masters in Augusta. Amazing experience. Because I have saved and invested, I was able to take time off work, spend some money for this trip freely and enjoy this “bucket list” experience I won’t forget. Our finances, slowly growing to $1 M will bring us financial security and options like you. That brings happiness for me/us.

          No doubt having about $1 M in the bank via ETFs churning out distributions and capital gains for you – you are set for life. Very well done.

          Reply
  10. “For those that don’t care about any sort of early retirement I’d like to hear from you too.” — you asked for it!

    “Is Financial Independence Retire Early (FIRE) right for you?”

    Not a chance in H-E-Double Hockey Sticks.

    First, we should all know by now ‘Financial Independence’ is a complete misnomer and a fake construction; there is no such thing. The closest you can get to ‘FI’ is a very large pile of cash, but even this is not guaranteed (see Zimbabwe). Everything up from there only adds deeper layers of dependence and correlation, “such as real estate, stocks, bonds, or a business…”. Almost every reader will scream about it being mere semantics, and it is, so why not use truthful, factual, and correct verbiage rather than an emotion based slogan? I would guess it’s because those promoting the idea and those seeking the ideology are emotionally driven. Which is a wonderful segue to my next point…

    “…many people will be able to relate FI to the concept of “F—K you, money”. This money gives you power to say no (or yes) to bosses, co-workers, and just about anyone else.”

    Sigh…desperate and depressing. Let’s break down why:

    “This money gives you power…” — a very obvious yet very wrong misconception and belief, but wholly understandable within a hyper-Capitalist environment. This might be the depressing part, that people think they only have power when they have money. Besides that, it’s most likely not ‘power’ one is seeking, but fulfillment, happiness, or purpose, of which money will deliver very little. We only have to have a cursory glance at any number of ‘Happiness Index’ reports: countries such as Singapore, Netherlands, and Bhutan are all on par, yet people in Singapore earn almost 20 times as those in Bhutan, and those in the Netherlands pay 3 times as much in tax as in the other two countries. How can people who make a lot of money, make very little money, or pay a lot of money all have relatively the same degree of life satisfaction? The answer isn’t tied to money. Power is not in the piggybank.

    “…relate FI to the concept of “F—K you, money” ” — this is perhaps the desperate bit. Think of your fresh faced twentysomething self…I’ll bet you definitely did not harbour a “F–K you” attitude, but one of optimism and creativity (possibly even of service). Ask yourself where/when/how your mindset became fractured, souring from engaged to disengaged. Studies have shown almost 80% of high performance employees value trade mastery over money. If money is your overarching focus and goal, you are probably underutilizing yourself and thus slowly drifting towards that “F–K you” mindset. Kind of like a dog that chews on your shoes because you don’t walk it or play with it enough.

    A Capitalist society may give small rewards (e.g. FIRE) to hard work and sacrifice, but the world rewards different thinking in monstrously greater magnitudes. There were lots of other investors last century, yet thinking differently delivered Buffett to the top. There were tons of other computer nerds out there, but thinking differently allowed the rise of Gates and Jobs. All the billionaires in the world are still fully active (e.g. NOT passive) in their businesses. It’s full engagement, not disengagement which brings freedom.

    “…freedom of time would provide us with opportunities to do a host of other things we’ve largely put off to date:

    Spend more time together
    Spend more time with family
    Visit friends
    Meet new people
    Enjoy existing hobbies and passions
    Try new hobbies or experiences
    Potentially travel more
    Become more fit (although we are trying to do this today)
    Eat healthier (although we are working on this today)
    Time to volunteer our time to causes and services in need.”

    You don’t need more money/time/options to do any of these things. As a true life anecdote, I have many relatives who did (and still do) everything on your list all while hands-on owning and operating businesses full-time for 35+ years. As for the equation: MONEY + TIME = OPTIONS… it’s wrong(ish). All the inputs exist independently of each other, and it does not compute very shortly after basic needs are met. Your “Options” result is superficial; what you truly desire is what that option represents.

    “One thing that continues to get my attention is this FIRE movement – the desire of various blog authors to be financially independent and therefore retire early. I think I’ve noticed this movement online now more than ever.” — as I wrote elsewhere, this is the result of a small number of events to which people seem to have a hard time responding. It has also coincided with the rise of financial and happiness inequality, and increase of general anxiety (and perhaps the decline in general resilience). Any wonder people are wanting to switch off and drop out? However, running away is a safety mechanism which is no longer useful…unless you are still being chased by lions and tigers and bears…oh my!

    I’ll close with a couple of examples…the first being Happiest Man In The World, Matthieu Ricard, a near-70 year old molecular biologist turned Buddhist monk. He’s practiced meditation for more than 10,000 hours (cue Malcolm Gladwell; not to mention the monks who have 60,000 hours under their belts…robes?), owns nothing and earns no money…yet works tirelessly almost every day of the year.

    The second is Viktor Frankl, author of ‘Man’s Search for Meaning’ — a recollection of his time spent in a WWII concentration camp. While the monk Matthieu willingly chose to have nothing and fill his time with health and life, Viktor had everything forcibly removed from him and placed in an environment of unimaginable suffering and death. Yet, he managed to not only survive but thrive (and even create).

    One life of joyful abundance, one life of unrelenting hardship, same result. Give that a thought next time you complain about your job being a “prison” (a la MMM); you are probably saying ‘F–K you’ to the wrong person.

    FIRE is the result of acute ego damage and continuous ill-managed emotions; it has no place in my life.
    The paradox is, fixing a mindset is far more valuable than filling a bank account, but money is much easier than mind.
    And people will almost always choose the easy option.

    It’s +12 here and green…I’m going outside.

    Reply
    1. “Is Financial Independence Retire Early (FIRE) right for you?”

      Not a chance in H-E-Double Hockey Sticks.

      LOL when I read this on vacation this past week.

      Nothing is guaranteed as you say – and even then – I want to work for the rest of my life…that includes some form of productivity and service.

      Regarding the “F–K You” money I 1) would never say that to my employer and 2) I don’t believe in it per se. It was a quote from the book. I do however SST believe in this principle = having enough income to meet one’s basic needs. We are striving for this and getting there slowly. I believe and I know it will…provide my wife and I with options.

      You are correct, my list of what I could do with my time doesn’t need to wait until FI but certainly there is only so much time in the day for things. Therefore having more control and more options regarding where, with whom and how we spend it is almost invaluable and cannot be quantified. You can’t ignore the fact that you can’t do everything you want all at once. It must be measured and you must prioritize your life (every day).

      Money is not my overarching focus. Never has been. However having “enough” is what we are striving for sooner than later since my productivity to society can and should extend far beyond my day-time job or this blog. Time will provide that opportunity.

      It’s certainly not 12 Deg. C here yet! 😉

      Reply
  11. I look at your housing costs and wonder why people think once they pay off their mortgage they are free. All in for my place my rent is $1000,for a two bedroom suite with my own backyard which also includes cable wifi, heat light, laundry, the only bills I have outside of rent(my half $500)is food of around $250mth, phone $100 mth, gas and vehicle costs of $150 mth and entertainment of $250 mth. All of my living expenses are less than what people pay to own a home after their mortgage is paid off, and I am looked down on as an idiot for throwing my money away to pay my landlords mortgage. My choosing to rent has made my trip to FI way quicker than if I was an owner, yet home ownership is espoused as one of the best financial decisions a person can make( but renting has allowed me to invest 60% of my take home pay to achieve FI before 50).After age 50 I can keep working for a couple of years and basically bank all my pay and in two years buy a nice house if I want without paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in carrying costs interest etc(these costs are never spoken about by homeowners), or I will be able to move to a lower cost area and enjoy my retirement if I so desire.
    People need to look at the big picture in life and calculate total costs over 20-40 years to get a real understanding of what it costs to live.

    Reply
    1. “All of my living expenses are less than what people pay to own a home after their mortgage is paid off, and I am looked down on as an idiot for throwing my money away to pay my landlords mortgage.”

      Not me Mike. I think renting for you sounds very smart financially. Home ownership is not cheap by any means and you only come out “ahead” if your property value rises significantly over time. Otherwise, home ownership is far more of a lifestyle and emotional decision vs. a financial one.

      Thanks for your comment.

      Reply

Post Comment