Home > RRSP > Online RRSP calculators freak me out

Online RRSP calculators freak me out

August 23rd, 2011

Like seeing a woman with way too much makeup on, the results produced by many online RRSP calculators freak me out.

Why?

Have you ever seen the math these calculators tell you?  It can be rather shocking not to mention depressing. Here’s my example.  I’m currently trying to contribute about $200 per month in my RRSP.  I think that’s pretty decent.

Using this online calculator, making the following assumptions:

 

I get the following results:

 

Really?

I’ll need $1.4 million for an annual income of $48,500 in future dollars to meet my retirement objective?

Whoa.

There is no way I can afford an extra $700 per month right now to meet my long-term RRSP objective.   I’d rather be out of mortgage debt.  I’d rather pay off my line of credit.  I’d rather put some money into dividend-paying stocks like Bank of Nova Scotia and Fortis.

 

Dear readers,

This math leads me to ask the following questions:

1) Based on my monthly RRSP contributions, should I be concerned?

2) Are my assumptions realistic?

3) What should I take away from these results?

 

Like most other 30-somethings, I’ve got plenty of bills to pay and a life to live.  It’s not possible nor realistic nor fun to save or invest everything.  These calculators freak me out!

How about you?

I look forward to your comments!

Thanks for reading and sharing this article.
Categories: RRSP Tags:
  1. August 15th, 2012 at 20:44 | #1

    I always used to study post in news papers but now as I am a user of internet thus from now I am using net for content, thanks to web.

  2. September 13th, 2011 at 17:00 | #2

    For a calculator that takes into account pensions, CPP, and OAS try www,retirementadvisor,ca. It is free and more accurate.

    • September 13th, 2011 at 17:29 | #3

      @Dr. Dale,

      Thanks for the calculator reference. I knew about this one and have now added it to my sidebar under “Calculators”. This site is great, lots of nice, simple tools!

  3. August 27th, 2011 at 10:16 | #4

    What these calculators are showing is that we all need to save significantly more, and spend significantly less, if we want to get out of the rat race. Making more money doesn’t hurt, either!

    Debt-backed expansion has its limits, and does not result in real growth. If the crap of the last few years continue, that’s going to completely obliterate all of those expectations of 8% real returns for decades out. Maybe if you’re young enough you’ll be fine, but I’m not convinced and rather work on improving my odds now instead of waiting for the long-term trend to return.

    • August 28th, 2011 at 14:11 | #5

      @Invest It Wisely,

      Well said: “Debt-backed expansion has its limits, and does not result in real growth.” I worry (a bit) about governments taking on so much debt. Eventually it has to be paid back, doesn’t it? And you know what generation is going to be on the hook for all this…don’t you? It may not be fun, being a Gen Xer in the years to come.

  4. Elemag
    August 27th, 2011 at 00:32 | #6

    Mark, I apologize for being late with my comment- it’s been a crazy busy week, so I’ve got to do some catching up on reading my emails.

    This topic is very important and controversial at the same time. Just like many of the previous posts read we’ll all have different needs in our “golden years”, so what’s plenty for one may not be evan close to enough for another. On the other hand, to predict what the future rate of inflation is going to be, the growth of the economy (both global and domestic) as well as a thousand other factors is simply impossible. So, what do one do? Well, in my opinion, hope for the best and prepare for the worst. I don’t know if you and your wife have kids, but since mine were born, it’s a totally different ball game for us. My wife and I are still in the beginning of our careers. She has pension plan from her employment but I am not so lucky. I have been working two jobs for the last three years and we don’t take vacations each year. From our pesrpective, achieving a 1.5 mil retirement portfolio is not going to happen. Instead, I have set some simple goals for our household: paying down the mortgage as fast as possible, building a strong drip portfolio of bluechip dividend paying stocks in our TFSA accounts, contributing any extra cash to our RRSPs, taking good care of our material possessions to make them last and being very frugal. How much will we have, I don’t know and I don’t care so much. In my old age, I know I will want to spend time with grandkids (God willing), practicing and teaching aikido, gardening, wood working- all very inexpensive activities that will keep my body fit and my mind occupied from old age distractions : )

    Planning for old age is important, but should people stress so much over questions like:”How much will I have?”, “Am I going to outlive my money?”, “What if I end up on the street?”, etc. Hey, we are all born with nothing, and we’ll all die with nothing. This isn’t to say forget about all financial planning, but to…well, may be, focus more on the jorney, than on the final destination.

    Lastly, let’s not forget the story of the turtle and the rabbit. Have patience, pesristence and faith and Karma will take care of the rest!

    Have a wonderful weekend!

    • August 28th, 2011 at 19:16 | #7

      @Elemag,

      Don’t apologize, I’m just happy you and others take the time to comment! Especially when they are this detailed!

      You’re right, it is a little controversial.

      I’m no forecaster that’s for sure, that’s why your “hope for the best and prepare for the worst” is an excellent comment. I’m trying to do just that. I think a big, fat RRSP nest egg while great, also has its drawbacks. As a senior, I do not want to be taxed more in my retirement than in my working years and I fear a big RRSP egg is not aligned to that objective. I want to work towards paying less tax, not more, as I age.

      My wife and I don’t have any kids, which you’re right, it changes the game a bit, but I don’t think the financial freedom journey is really any different. Define a robust plan, save, invest and stick to the plan for decades. It’s not a race nor a competition. It’s about doing what is right for you, for your family and learning more everyday about how to be better; in life and in all facets of personal finance. That’s my philosophy.

      I guess that’s why I wish RRSP calculators weren’t so gloomy. I understand the intent, these are businesses after all. Yet, there is a much bigger picture at play and most folks don’t realize how many options they really have. Maybe through this blog we can all learn, share and get better? ;)

  5. Tara
    August 26th, 2011 at 19:08 | #8

    I think $900 a month is a very reasonable savings goal… right now I am saving over $3,000 per month (on a mid-5 figure income). Once you get all your debt paid off you will have no trouble reaching your savings goals. Just be patient. :-)

  6. August 25th, 2011 at 13:54 | #9

    Based on these results Mark, how many Canadian will be able to retire?
    I think there’s a marketing twist behind them, focus on your plan and stay the course, you’ll be fine when the time comes.

    • August 25th, 2011 at 20:50 | #10

      @BTI,

      I think there is mostly marketing behind these calculators, but they still worry me when the math pops up. This is why I need to rely on more than my RRSP. A multiple pronged approach using my TFSA, counting on my pension and dividend-stocks should be a well-rounded recipe.

  7. August 25th, 2011 at 13:52 | #11

    Sorry for Fortis I should have said that 8.26% was for Capital gain and 5.18% for dividends.

  8. August 25th, 2011 at 13:42 | #12

    Although the 6% stock market return is realistic, it does not account for dividends. I have statistics on the TSX back to December 1956. The XIRR from then to the end of July 2011 is 5.9%. The XIRR to the end of 2010 is 6.04%.

    Now on to dividends. I have only tracked my stocks in Quicken since the end of 1987, so I will use this data. The XIRR for the TSX since end of 1987 to today is 5.91%.

    Tracking BMO from the end of 1987 to today, I have an XIRR of 16.08%. Of this, 9.80% is capital gain and 6.28% is dividends. Another stock is Fortis (FTS). I added this to Quicken 13 November 1987. My XIRR to date is 13.44%. Of this 8.26% is capital gains and 8.28% is dividends.

    If you do not know what IRR is, it is internal rate of return. That is compound annual rate of return. So that means for Fortis, I have a compouded rate of return of 13.44% per year since 1987.

    • August 25th, 2011 at 20:53 | #13

      @Susan,

      That XIRR for BMO and Fortis is a CRAZY good return. I’ve often read that over a span of 30-40 years, dividends make up close to 50% of stock market returns. It seems your own data/holdings reflect this. This is even more reinforcement Susan, that beyond my RRSP, buying and holding Canadian dividend-paying stocks can be an extremely valuable part of my retirement portfolio long-term. If they can work for you, so well, why not others? Why not me? Thanks for your comments!

  9. August 25th, 2011 at 10:33 | #14

    Great comments on this post. I agree with Susan–you’ll earn CPP as well.

    And so many others have alluded to your pension, which has a really high value when you think about your future payout, multiplied by 25. For instance, if a pension pays $2000 a month, or $24,000 a year, its true value is $600,000 (based on the 4% rule) so you could probably add that to your pot.

    I also think you’ll do better than a 3% real return. Of course, you never know. But if this flatlining market lasts for another 10 years, wow—you’re going to make a killing when it rebounds. Hopefully, Mark, the markets don’t budge for many years.

    Sorry Susan….we’re on different sides of the coin on that one. As a retiree, you want the markets rising. As a collector of market assets I (and Mark) want it flatlining or falling, for many years if possible.

    • August 25th, 2011 at 21:02 | #15

      @Andrew,

      Thanks for your comment, as always. I hope I’ll get more than a 3% real return, and if I own some dividend-paying stocks like Susan has, and have some similar success (time wil tell), then I might get much more than 3%. I too, hope markets don’t climb for years. They may not but nobody really knows as much as experts think they do :)

      As for climbing markets, I’m not too concerned because I’ve learned from smart people like you that I need not focus on portfolio value, rather, income replacement for my retirement. I love the analogy of being a collector of assets. I only hope I can be patient enough to follow your lead Andrew and Susan over many, many years. It’s not so much what you pick as an asset, but how long you hold that asset that creates your wealth.

  10. August 25th, 2011 at 08:00 | #16

    I agree w/ CFM – save as much as you can. Those online calculators make few assumptions on how your lifestyle will change after retirement. You may downsize to a fully-paid-for smaller house, have steady streams of passive income, etc.

    • August 25th, 2011 at 21:05 | #17

      Very true, you’ve made some good points. Maybe downsizing will eventually ease the burden? I’ve got hopefully another 30 years to consider that. In the meantime, I will try not to dwell on the $1.4 mil. RRSP nest-egg!

  11. August 24th, 2011 at 21:51 | #18

    If the numbers don’t lie as Glen Cooke suggests, and I think he is right, then it sounds to me that having a regular 9-5 day job (and diligently investing in your RRSP) may not be enough to retire comfortably. You may have to consider other sources of income, and asking for a raise isn’t going to cut it either.

    I watched a lecture awhile ago from a self made millionaire and he suggested that the road to financial freedom must include the following over your lifetime:

    1. You need to own your own business
    2. You need to invest in stocks
    3. You need to invest in real estate

    Dividend income, rental income, and business income provide you with the proper diversification. Relying on a single source of income is risky, and as the numbers show insufficient.

    • August 25th, 2011 at 21:09 | #19

      @Kanwal,

      Thanks for your comment! I think this is why I am such a fan of dividend-paying stocks, the TFSA and other types of investments and accounts. RRSPs don’t have to be the be-all, end-all like so many financial institutions tout. You’ve said it well: “dividend income, rental income, and business income” can provide some excellent diversification. Any one is better than none in my book.

  12. August 24th, 2011 at 21:50 | #20

    @Glenn Cooke

    I have an issue with the numbers because of the following reasons:

    1/ It’s an RRSP-specific calculator and it assumes the average investor is going to be investing exclusively in RRSP accounts for the rest of their lives and isn’t creating wealth by other means (such as taxable accounts, other investments, etc.).

    2/ The ‘number’ one needs in order to be able to retire can vary considerably from one person to another, despite inflationary pressure. Requiring $1.4 million for retirement may be necessary for some, especially if an investor has all of their eggs within RRSP accounts and needs to draw on their savings. These savings will continuously diminish.

    On the other hand, Susan’s number of $1.1 million could be quite realistic for another, especially if an investor has no debts, and has created an income stream derived from taxable accounts, while and at the same time being able to preserve a sizable chunk of the book value invested. Not having to dip into your principle = preservation of wealth.

    In my view, spending during retirement is one of the most overlooked and important items to plan for. Leaving the workforce is not like winning the Lotto 649 (for many people at least). Upon retirement, monitoring and tracking your spending doesn’t go into shutdown mode for most people.

    I recently did a review on Canadian Dream’s book, “Free At 45″ and the estimates and numbers he has crunched may surprise you.

    I’m just saying that the number doesn’t always have to be that high in order to retire, especially if you have optimally managed your debt, and are engaged in other investment activities. I know, because I did it.

    I understand where you are coming from with respect to inflation, but to suggest that yesterday’s millionaires are today’s “billionaires”? That’s quite the quantum leap IMO. One billion is a thousand million!

    With that being said, I am in total agreement with you in that investors need to pay special attention to MERs. Mutual funds and ETFs with higher management fees can eat away at not only your returns, but can slow down your path to retirement.

    Great post! :)

  13. August 24th, 2011 at 20:19 | #21

    Those numbers are pretty scary all right, but do you know anyone who is upset that they have too much money in retirement? Or do you know anyone who could use more? Something to think about. I like what Glenn Cooke says.

    • August 24th, 2011 at 20:42 | #22

      @Cashflowmantra,

      Thanks for stopping by! Yeah, kinda scary but to answer your question, no I haven’t :)

      Inflation is absolutely an investment killer, and for some reason, I have a feeling my generation (x) is going to be hit VERY hard by it.

      That’s why my RRSP is never going to be enough. I’ll need my pension and also some passive dividend income to keep me ahead of the game.

      I’m going over to check out your site soon!

  14. August 24th, 2011 at 17:06 | #23

    I can only say what my experince was. Before I stopped working in 1999, my investment return (10 year XIRR) was running at 10 to 11%. From 1999 to now it is running at 4% (as I am taking out 3-4%. I do know know what the inflation rate was. (I am mainly into dividend paying stock, but had bonds, GICs when interest rates were really high.)

    I think that you should include CPP in your calculations as you probably will have that. Take the annual CPP benefit you will receive and multiple by 20 to get a value for it. Current maximum is $524.23 * 12 * 20 is $125,815.20.

    CPP is multiplied by 20 because it is indexed to inflation. If you have pensions not indexed to inflation, you can get a rough idea of what they are worth by multipling the annual income by 5 to 10.

    I had half my money in a Trading Account and half in an RRSP. As someone mentioned, you do get hit with lots of taxes with RRSP withdrawals.

    Also, from what I have read, you can take out 4% from a portfolio each year which would imply you would need $1,123,625. However, this is from the 8%, 4% rules, where you make 8% and take out 4%. However, you do show a very good return. I thought average returns on balance investments portfolio was around 8%.

    • August 24th, 2011 at 20:51 | #24

      @Susan,

      Thanks for your comments!

      If I keep working for another 20+ years, I should get the maximum CPP. That will help. Given I have a pension, an RRSP and some other investments, GIS is out of the question but that’s a good problem to have. Regardless, these types of calculators freak me out because $1.4 million seems like a ton of cash. That said, my plan is not to have $1.4 mil in my RRSP even if I could save that much with some help from compounding, because I’ll get killed on taxes upon withdrawals. My plan is to have a rather modest RRSP and hopefully a very fat TFSA. That way, TFSA, it’s all tax-free and as the dividends and distributions get paid, that is what I live off of. I should never need to touch the principle. So, I’m a fan of what you wrote: half your money in a trading account, the other half in an RRSP; sounds balanced to me!

      I’m also betting on inflation being about 3%, which in my opinion, might be too low many years from low. Something’s gotta give at some point…

  15. August 24th, 2011 at 15:40 | #25

    For those that don’t believe the numbers, how about instead of arguing that the calculators are created by hungry invesment companies that you argue the numbers? The numbers aren’t lying.

    The real problem isn’t the numbers – that calculator is bang on. It’s the non-intuitive grasp people have of the impact of inflation over time. We all know how impactful compounding is on our investment growth – it’s the same monstrous affect that inflation has on our buying power.

    If you can’t see how this works going forward, look back. It wasn’t that long ago (say 30 years?) that being a millionaire was crazy rich. Now a millionaire is someone who’s got enough money for retirement. Now the term millionaire is replaced by billionaire. It’ll be the same thing 30 years from now.

    What you better figure out from this is:
    - you need a huge amount of money for retirement – way more than you think (there’s a reason people who don’t have defined pensions have to be careful after retirement). Start saving lots.
    - wait longer, expect to have to save more. Try running the same numbers but waiting until you’re 40 to start saving.
    - inflation and interest make a huge difference to our ability to fund retirement. You better be paying very careful attention to your rate of return. Little things like MER’s have a huge impact on what we’ll have left over for retirement.
    - also perhaps non-intuitively, it’s not just inflation and interest – it’s the gap between these two that matters a lot. You’ve got to beat inflation by a lot. Getting 8% rates of return in a 5% inflation year isn’t anything to write home about.

    • August 24th, 2011 at 20:56 | #26

      @Glenn Cooke,

      Thanks for your kind words of wisdom!

      So true your comments are, the powers of compounding and the destructive nature of inflation – I just hope the former stays well ahead of the latter.

      What are your strategies for this might I ask? I have a pension, so that eases the RRSP calculator headache I have, but are you investing in any securities that constantly pay you? Dividend stocks? Annuities? Other?

      Folks without a pension best create one themselves. It’s going to be painful for some in another 20-30 years, my generation, if little savings have occurred. CPP and OAS will only take folks so far.

      I’m also in agreement with what you said about MERs, fees are forever, unless of course, you don’t pay any via holding dividend-paying stocks.

      Any predictions on inflation in the years to come? I think my generation (x) is going to get hit hard by it. Just a guess, maybe a fear.

  16. August 24th, 2011 at 15:36 | #27

    I love the pic! I almost fell of my chair laughing. :)

    I’m with Jim – the last thing I want is a super-sized RRSP next egg that will require me to draw on the entire balance until there’s nothing left.

    IMO, it’s frustrating when you see specific estimates like the $1.4 million as if it can be applied to everybody’s financial situation.

    If you’re mortgage free and have a cash flow stream derived from taxable accounts, you many not even need RRSPs. But I agree with PIE, these calculators are designed to encourage investing in these types of accounts and likely tailored to less seasoned or interested investors.

    In answer to your questions:

    1/ No. You are investing what you can and focusing on paying off the all-mighty beast – your principal residence. You’ll have lots of time to plow more of your hard-earned dollars into non-registered and registered accounts when that occurs.

    2/ You are staying your course and it’s a realistic one.

    3/ This post really highlights how many investors are lured into the world of “RRSPs or you will never retire” mindset. I’m not saying they are not important, I’m just saying that they are not the only types of accounts available to accumulate wealth and in formulating one’s investment strategy.

    Nice post! :)

    • August 24th, 2011 at 21:03 | #28

      @TWC,

      Ha, thanks. Yeah, I thought it was a funny picture. Christina used to be quite attractive too, alas….

      Yeah, the $1.4 mil. nest egg was a bit of an eye-opener on some fronts but like you, I don’t want a big egg to crack. I’ll get killed on taxes at time of withdrawals. Why on earth would I want that in my old age?

      Our plan is to be mortgage free at retirement, having stable income from our dividend-payers + have our pensions, so that our RRSPs are really “emergency” money.

      Thanks for your answers to my questions:

      1) We feel tackling debt is VERY important because if you get too far behind, you can never catch up. I hate debt. Thanks for your support on this effort!

      2) We feel staying the course is a good plan.

      3) The calculator, like My University Money said, is a great tool to convince me to invest all my money in the calculator provider. Damn them!

  17. August 24th, 2011 at 09:35 | #29

    The calculator has a very strong incentive to convince you to invest all your money with the calculator provider. End of story.

  18. Anonymous
    August 23rd, 2011 at 23:52 | #31

    If you want to retire early, putting money in an RRSP is not going to help at all I believe. If you withdraw the money, there is a penalty for doing this, plus you are taxed at the your marginal rate (i.e as earned income). I know there is a tax deferral of your money and your taxes paid can be reduced.

    A non-registered account or TFSA will allow you to retire as you are generating passive/portfolio income. There a dividend tax credit for Canadian companies which means less taxes to pay. Derek Foster never used an RRSP, I believe.

    • August 24th, 2011 at 21:07 | #32

      @Anonymous,

      I think Derek uses an RRSP for some of his U.S. dividend-paying stocks, but I’m not sure. This way he avoid withholding taxes on those companies. Next time I see him, I’ll ask him and let you know!

      Thanks for your comments. The one about “a non-registered account or TFSA will allow you to retire as you are generating passive/portfolio income” – is exactly part of our plan! RRSPs are just one vehicle, not the only one.

  19. August 23rd, 2011 at 23:31 | #33

    Ok. I chuckled a little :)

    Those calculators are definitely on the safe side of the numbers. They are setup to entice you to invest. Isn’t there a quick buy mutual fund button next to it? The cost of inflation itself just compounds it out of this stratosphere. Boomer & Echo did a post on their personal rate of inflation and I have been wanting to do that just to validate if I truly have the 3% average. Nonetheless, the numbers are in the ball park but they assume a very fix pattern. 30 years at 6% and 30 years at 3%. We all know that you’ll probably have a bell curve of growth as you accumulate wealth and then preserve it by adjusting your percentage over time.

    1) On 200$ / month only, no TFSA and such. I would have to say yes (you should be concerned). However, what the numbers don’t account for is that you probably will increase your savings. That’s why I like to do my math.

    2) 90 years old is great! Still playing golf?

    3) I know you have a plan so I am not concerned for you :) For anyone reading, I think it’s important to map saving growth over time.

    I made the over a million $$$ realization a few years ago. That’s why I am building an income portfolio.

    Cheers!

    • August 24th, 2011 at 21:12 | #34

      @PIE,

      Thanks for your comments, as always. Yeah, they definitely are there to entice, with Mackenzie no less :)

      $200 per month, RRSP only, no pension, no TFSA, etc. is definitely not enough. It is good, but definitely not enough. That’s why we have a TFSA and other accounts. I can’t imagine using the RRSP only.

      Yes, I do have a plan, much like yours, which is the thing that keeps me feeling safe. If I had to rely on my RRSP only, I’d be freaking out now….maybe like seeing Christina A. without ANY makeup??? Geez, she used to be cute too. Just like inflation, time can be a scary thing for some ;)

  20. August 23rd, 2011 at 22:15 | #35

    I guess I’m hoping for more than a real return of 2.9% before retirement and definitely more than 0% after retirement. On the other hand it can be dangerous to just up the returns until your plan works.

    • August 24th, 2011 at 21:14 | #36

      @Michael,

      I’m hoping for more than a 3% real return as well, but man, inflation is such an investment killer. That’s why I don’t keep much cash on hand, I’m pretty much invested all the time. Emergency fund(s) aside, extra cash is a big loser to inflation. Bonds aren’t much better, they should always keep pace though.

  21. August 23rd, 2011 at 21:27 | #37

    Um, you won’t need the full 48.5K becuase you and your wife both have defined pensions through work, right?

    Aren’t these calculators designed by mutual fund and insurance companies, so people think they are way behind, and add more money into their mutual funds?

    $700 per year isn’t that much extra. I suggest you put that into actively-managed mutual funds, with MERs over 3% so you get the best return possible ;) I think those “dividend mutual funds” you just reviewed are looking pretty good, lame returns and no dividends. You should do this right away!

    Cheers

    • August 24th, 2011 at 21:20 | #38

      @Ninja,

      We shouldn’t need $1.4 mil, because of our pensions (yes, you are correct) but there are no guarantees in life – it implies we are working there for another 20 years or so. We might have to, because of the benefits alone!

      These calculators are definitely biased but nonetheless, the math is a tad scary. No, that’s $700 PER MONTH extra I’d need to save. No way we can do that. Instead, we’ll focus on some dividend-investments and debt reduction (not necessarily in that order) and go from there. At least with the dividends, it’s getting paid to be an owner and we’ll let the power of compounded dividends work. With the mortgage, payments are not fun but they are an immediate, after-tax guaranteed return on our investment.

      As for those “dividend mutual funds” you speak of, yeah, you’re right, maybe those are my retirement ticket afterall? ;)

  22. Jim McGraw
    August 23rd, 2011 at 21:08 | #39

    Really? I don’t want $1.4 million in my RRSP… Think of all the taxes you pay as you unwind that thing… Unregistered account for me thanks!

    • August 24th, 2011 at 21:25 | #40

      @Jim,

      Well said. I can’t imagine those taxes at my marginal rate as a 70-something. My goal in retirement is to pay less tax then, than I do now. Maximizing my TFSA every year will certainly help :)

Comments are closed.